South America Cries Out: Neoliberalism — Never Again!
✑ VIJAY PRASHAD` ╱ ± 6 minutes
Neoliberalism has wrecked the world. It is why the people of South America are taking to the streets and the ballot box to advocate for change.

It was chanted in the streets of Santiago, Chile; it was drawn on the walls in Buenos Aires.

Neoliberalism has wrecked the world. It is why the people of South America are taking to the streets and the ballot box to advocate for change.
From: Independent Media Institute, Oct 26, 2019. ╱ About the author
Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter, a project of the Independent Media Institute. He is the chief editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He has written more than twenty books, including The Darker Nations: A People’s History of the Third World (The New Press, 2007), The Poorer Nations: A Possible History of the Global South (Verso, 2013), The Death of the Nation and the Future of the Arab Revolution (University of California Press, 2016) and Red Star Over the Third World (LeftWord, 2017). He writes regularly for Frontline, the Hindu, Newsclick, AlterNet and BirGün. On twitter: @vijayprashad.
The slogan is pithy—Neoliberalismo nunca más (Neoliberalism Never Again).
It was chanted in the streets of Santiago, Chile; it was drawn on the walls
in Buenos Aires, Argentina; and in a more sober register, it is mentioned
in a seminar in Mexico City, Mexico.
This article was produced by Globetrotter, a project of the Independent Media Institute.
Elections and protests rattle the continent. The protest by Chilean
students against metro fees has now become a general protest against the
government. In Colombia, the right wing suffered significant defeats in the
local elections. Bogotá’s mayor is now Claudia López, the first woman, the
first gay woman, the first gay woman from the Green Party to win the post;
the mayor of Bogotá is the second most important person after the country’s
president. In the town of Turbaco, near Cartagena, a former guerrilla from
the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC)—Guillermo Torres or
“Julian Conrado” won the mayor’s post. This is the first time that
FARC—which had been in an armed struggle for over half a century—won such a
significant election (they now joke in Venezuela that FARC has more mayors
than Juan Guaidó—the man set up by Washington to overthrow Nicolás Maduro).
IMF Election
In Argentina, the electorate tossed out the government of Mauricio Macri,
who had taken his country to the International Monetary Fund (IMF),
produced a harsh austerity budget, and then disregarded the pain felt by
his compatriots. If Haiti and Ecuador simmer with “IMF Riots,” Argentina
had an “IMF Election.” The incoming government of Alberto Fernández and
Cristina Fernández de Kirchner promises an exit from neoliberalism.
Argentina’s external debt is at about $285 billion, just under $6,500
per person. This foreign debt is almost 75 percent higher than when Macri
took office in 2015.
In August, Fitch cut Argentina’s
rating
to CCC, slipping closer and closer to the dreaded D rating. As an exporter
of minimally processed food, Argentina is dependent on prices set
elsewhere—a victim, as are many countries that export raw materials, of the
financialization
of commodity prices. It has imported expensive debt and exported low-priced
foods.
What Is Neoliberalism?
Forty years ago, the propertied classes revolted against any social
democratic arrangement in their countries. As a result of fears over
capitalist turbulence, Keynesians argued that the state must intervene to
smooth over the instability of the business cycle. Pressure from the
workers’ movements and the Left forced governments to finance social
security, education, health care, and elder care. Funds for state
intervention and for social spending came—largely—from progressive
taxation. The rich no longer wanted to make these payments. One of the
earliest countries to undergo a neoliberal transformation was Chile.
As the rich withdrew from taxation, governments—of a variety of political
persuasions—struggled to fund their own borrowing and the social spending
won by the workers. Multilateral organizations—such as the IMF—and ratings
agencies punished countries that had high deficits; this is why many
countries passed balanced budget amendments that prevented borrowing to pay
for social spending. A combination of the tax strike by the rich and the
balanced budget amendment squeezed government spending.
One of the earliest countries to undergo a neoliberal transformation was Chile.
To raise funds, governments did at least five things:
-
Privatized public assets. Governments sold off public assets that had been built by the sacrifices of previous generations—assets such as public banks, public utilities, and public lands.
-
Commodified areas of social life. Governments allowed private firms to charge money for the delivery of goods that had previously been seen as social and whose delivery was not for a fee—such as water and electricity.
-
Deregulated business enterprises. Regulations of business enterprises allowed governments to both protect the public from the excesses of profit-making—such as environmental pollution—and allow fees to be collected by the State.
-
Gave subsidies to big corporations. To attract big corporations to their jurisdictions, governments began to provide massive subsidies to them—subsidies that were often larger than the funds laid out toward social services. In the United States, this is called “corporate welfare”—more welfare for corporations than for the indigent.
-
Cut social spending. Austerity budgets became the norm, with States cutting social security, education, health care, and elder care.
This remains the core of neoliberalism. It has wrecked the world. It is why
they are saying “never again” to neoliberalism in the ballot box and on the
streets of South America.
Exit From Neoliberalism
The new government has pledged to abandon the road of austerity, to
robustly fund the social commitments of the government, and to adopt a
national development strategy. How it will do so with the massive debt
overhang and the expected pressure from the creditors and the multilateral
organizations is to be seen.
In Argentina, debates around the exit from neoliberalism have been ongoing;
the recently released
book
Salir del Neoliberalismo (Exit Neoliberalism) captures the thrust of these
debates. In his essay in the book, Claudio Katz lays out four different
scenarios for Argentina, which include a repetition of the story of
Portugal and of Greece. Toward the end of his essay, Katz says that the
cost of the crisis should not be borne by the public but by the authors of
the crisis—namely, the creditors. An audit of the enormous $57 billion IMF
loan to Argentina is necessary; so too is a suspension of payment to
service that debt. Drawing from Katz, one can go further:
-
All subsidies to corporations should be suspended.
-
There should be an audit of each of these subsidies.
-
An audit should be immediately ordered of the taxation department.
-
Letters of intent should be sent off to tax havens that hold the money of Argentinian nationals.
-
And so on.
Such means—fairly straightforward—should be part of a national debate about
tax revenues and subsidies to corporations. If subsidies are suspended and
if taxes are collected, there should be enough money to finance not only
food sovereignty schemes that tackle endemic hunger, but also cooperative
production for food and goods.
We are in a period of transition. There is no doubt that the ruling classes
have no idea how to solve the problems posed by capitalism—massive wealth,
massive inequality, climate catastrophe, and war. Neoliberalism, their
policy framework of the past 40 years, is now in serious crisis. No full
alternative is available. We have glimmers of the future; experiments need
to be tried. Argentina’s government will be under pressure to test an exit
to neoliberalism. There will be excluded workers and feminists in the
streets making sure that it does not betray their hopes.
This article was produced by Globetrotter, a project of the Independent Media Institute.
Top image: Protests in Santiago, Chile, 2019. From: Carlos Figueroa / Wikimedia. |
---|
Comments
Post a Comment
Your thoughts...